Key result
CartoSound models generated from the left atrial transducer location provided the most comprehensive rendering, higher quality CT registration, and greater mock ablation accuracy.
Why the study?
Does CartoSound improve left atrial navigation and CT image integration in patients?
Observational (n=10)
Does CartoSound improve left atrial navigation and CT image integration in patients?
CartoSound using a left atrial transducer location provides comprehensive imaging and accurate mock ablation guidance, functioning effectively as both a stand-alone tool and a facilitator of CT integration.
May support left atrial CartoSound for navigation and CT integration; leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: The utility of "virtual" imaging systems for left atrial (LA) navigation has been hampered by inadequate spatial detail, as well as inaccurate integration of more detailed preoperative images, such as those generated by computed tomography (CT). CartoSound is an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-based technology that promises to ameliorate these problems. Our objective was to examine the capabilities and optimal use of CartoSound, both as a stand-alone tool and as a facilitator of CT image integration. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 patients, CartoSound models of the LA were generated using each of 4 ICE transducer locations: LA, right atrium (RA), coronary sinus (CS), and esophagus (ESO). Each of these models was used to register CT-derived LA models into the operative workspace. We correlated the comprehensiveness of LA imaging from each transducer location with the quality of the CT registration, as well as the accuracy of mock circumferential antral ablation guided by the CartoSound model alone or by the CT model. The LA transducer location provided the most comprehensive rendering of the LA, which was associated with higher quality CT registration and greater CT-guided mock ablation accuracy. Mock ablation guided by the CartoSound model alone was at least as accurate as CT, although the models were less intuitive. CONCLUSIONS: For LA navigation, optimal use of CartoSound may require LA transducer location, which is effective for stand-alone use and as a facilitator of CT image integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwartzman et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Left atrial navigation (n=10). CartoSound models from left atrial transducer location vs. Other transducer locations and CT models was evaluated on Comprehensiveness of LA imaging, quality of CT registration, and accuracy of mock ablation. CartoSound models generated from the left atrial transducer location provided the most comprehensive rendering, higher quality CT registration, and greater mock ablation accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: