Key result
The EuroSCORE II predictive model demonstrated good discriminative power (AUC 0.864 ± 0.032 for general cardiac surgery) and adequate calibration in Tunisian patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
The performance of the EuroSCORE II predictive model required evaluation in a Tunisian population to validate its use in Tunisia.
Does the EuroSCORE II accurately predict risk in a Tunisian population undergoing cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=418)
No
Does the EuroSCORE II accurately predict risk in a Tunisian population undergoing cardiac surgery?
The EuroSCORE II is a valid and well-calibrated tool for predicting risk in Tunisian patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Supports EuroSCORE II applicability in Tunisian cardiac surgery; extends validation data but leaves open prospective confirmation before widespread adoption.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the predictive model (EuroSCORE II) on a Tunisian population to validate its use in our country. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of data from 418 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016 in the department of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery of the Sahloul University Hospital of Sousse. The EuroSCORE ΙΙ is calculated using the application validated on the site www.euroscore.org. The performance of the score is evaluated by analyzing its discriminative power by constructing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and analyzing its calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics. RESULTS: The EuroSCORE II shows good discriminative power in our population with an area under the ROC curve more than 0.7 in all study groups (0.864 ± 0.032 for general cardiac surgery, 0.822 ± 0.061 for coronary surgery, 0.864 ± 0.052 for valvular surgery, and 0.900 ± 0.041 for urgent cardiac surgery). The model appears to be calibrated as well by obtaining P values above the statistical significance level of 0.05 (0.638 for general cardiac surgery, 0.543 for coronary surgery, 0.179 for valvular surgery, and 0.082 for urgent cardiac surgery). CONCLUSION: The EuroSCORE II presents acceptable performance in our population, attested by a good discriminative power and an adequate calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidi et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (n=418). EuroSCORE II was evaluated on Discriminative power (area under the ROC curve) and calibration (AUC 0.864 ± 0.032 (general cardiac surgery)). The EuroSCORE II predictive model demonstrated good discriminative power (AUC 0.864 ± 0.032 for general cardiac surgery) and adequate calibration in Tunisian patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: