Key result
EuroSCORE II demonstrated good overall discrimination and calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Does the EuroSCORE II model accurately predict in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery in Argentina?
Observational (n=503)
Yes
Does the EuroSCORE II model accurately predict in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery in Argentina?
EuroSCORE II demonstrates good overall discriminative capacity and calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality in Argentinean cardiac surgery patients, though it may underestimate risk in lower-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports EuroSCORE II for risk prediction in Argentine cardiac surgery; extends validation but leaves open subgroup recalibration.
OBJECTIVES: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) is an updated version of the original EuroSCORE that must be extensively validated. The objective was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of EuroSCORE II in predicting the immediate results of cardiac surgery in Argentinean centres. METHODS: A prospective consecutive series of 503 adults who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2012 and April 2013 was studied. EuroSCORE II discrimination and accuracy were assessed in the overall cohort and in two surgically defined subgroups: isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and non-CABG surgery. Additionally, a risk-adjusted cumulative sum control chart analysis was performed. RESULTS: In-hospital overall mortality rate was 4.17%, while the mortality rate predicted by the EuroSCORE II was 3.18% (P = 0.402). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated a good overall (area 0.856) and non-CABG subgroup (area 0.857) discrimination (P = 0.0001), while discrimination in the CABG subgroup was poorer (area 0.794, P = 0.014). The model showed good calibration in predicting in-hospital mortality, both overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.082) and for each subgroup (non-CABG, P = 0.308, and CABG, P = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: EuroSCORE II reflects a better current surgical performance and offers a new quality standard to evaluate local outcomes. EuroSCORE showed an overall good discriminative capacity and calibration in this local population; nevertheless, the model performed optimally in non-CABG surgery and in highest-risk patients, underestimating in-hospital mortality in lowest-risk cases. The latter finding may be interpreted as an inadequate behaviour of the model, as a poor performance of surgeons or both. Larger prospective studies will elucidate this hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borracci et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery (n=503). EuroSCORE II vs. Observed mortality was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (AUC 0.856, p=0.402). EuroSCORE II demonstrated good overall discrimination and calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: