Key result
UK anaesthetic trainees had a high prevalence of perceived stress (37%), burnout risk (25%), and depression risk (18%), driven by factors like low exercise and high non-clinical workload.
Why the study?
Anaesthetic trainees face high levels of work stress, burnout, and depression, but an in-depth evaluation examining affected groups and associated factors among UK trainees was lacking.
Cross-Sectional (n=397)
Yes
A significant proportion of UK anaesthetic trainees experience high levels of stress, burnout, and depression, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and support.
Supports mental health resources for UK anaesthetic trainees; leaves open causal factors and intervention efficacy.
Summary There is growing evidence that anaesthetic trainees experience, and may be particularly susceptible to, high levels of work stress, burnout and depression. This is concern for the safety and wellbeing of these doctors and for the patients they treat. To date, there has been no in‐depth evaluation of these issues among UK anaesthetic trainees to examine which groups may be most affected, and to identify the professional and personal factors with which they are associated. We conducted an anonymous electronic survey to determine the prevalence of perceived stress, risk of burnout/depression and work satisfaction among anaesthetic trainees within South‐West England and Wales, and explored in detail the influence of key baseline characteristics, lifestyle and anaesthetic training variables. We identified a denominator of 619 eligible participants and received 397 responses, a response rate of 64%. We observed a high prevalence of perceived stress; 37% (95%CI 32–42%), burnout risk 25% (21–29%) and depression risk 18% (15–23%), and found that these issues frequently co‐exist. Having no children, > 3 days sickness absence in the previous year, ≤ 1 h.week −1 of exercise and > 7.5 h.week −1 of additional non‐clinical work were independant predictors of negative psychological outcomes. Although female respondents reported higher stress, burnout risk was more likely in male respondents. This information could help in the identification of at‐risk groups as well as informing ways to support these groups and to influence resource and intervention design. Targeted interventions, such as modification of exercise behaviour and methods of reducing stressors relating to non‐clinical workloads, warrant further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Looseley et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Stress, burnout, and depression in anaesthetic trainees (n=397). Anaesthetic training was evaluated on Prevalence of perceived stress (95% CI 32-42). UK anaesthetic trainees had a high prevalence of perceived stress (37%), burnout risk (25%), and depression risk (18%), driven by factors like low exercise and high non-clinical workload.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: