Key result
The Big Ten Conference implemented stringent return-to-play protocols, including daily antigen testing and comprehensive cardiac screening for COVID-19 positive athletes, to ensure safe sports resumption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This perspective details the decision-making framework used by the Big Ten to balance student-athlete safety and public health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
n February 2020, a number of institutions within the Big Ten began discussing the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on sports.On March 7, the Big Ten Task Force for Emerging Infectious Diseases was formed to provide council and sound medical advice to ensure the health, safety, and wellness of the Big Ten's students, staff and fans.On March 11, 2020, the National Basketball Association postponed its season after the first player tested positive for COVID-19 infection.The next day, college basketball tournament games were canceled.The issues at hand were clear: the multi-organ adverse effects (including cardiac), high rate of transmission, and overall uncertainty about short and long term effects of the coronavirus raised serious concerns about player safety as well as sports' role in propagation of the virus across the broader community.In this Perspective, the Big Ten Cardiac Registry Steering Committee reflects on the last several months through a series of questions.Our committee is made up of conference administrators and physicians in sports medicine, infectious disease, and cardiology.We look ahead to opportunities to return to play and contribute to public health.These reflections may be valuable to other organizations also struggling with how to best balance decisions for their members in the setting of imperfect information. WHAT WERE CORE CONSIDERATIONS BEHIND OUR DECISIONS AND HOW WAS RETURN TO PLAY HANDLED BETWEEN MAY AND AUGUST?We had several core considerations involved with our decision-making.We had to prioritize the well-being of the student athlete and assessed the following questions.How could we best reduce the risk of infection in student-athletes?Do we have the testing capacity?How easily could we contact trace if there was an outbreak of infection?If we do not return to play, how will this impact the physical and emotional well-being of the players?In addition, can we protect all the coaches and sports medicine staff from infection?Would we be risking community-level spread?Moving forward entailed great cooperation between universities, athletic departments, local health care and public health organizations.COVID-19 required the development of testing strategies that would not burden the supply chain needs for local hospitals.In general, students in fall sports, including football, were brought on campus first.It was recommended that all student-athletes and staff should sign an agreement of understanding requiring safe health standards to be Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes https://www.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rink et al. (2020) conducted an editorial in COVID-19. Return to play protocols and cardiac screening was evaluated. The Big Ten Conference implemented stringent return-to-play protocols, including daily antigen testing and comprehensive cardiac screening for COVID-19 positive athletes, to ensure safe sports resumption.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: