Key result
Time to reach the anaerobic threshold during cardiopulmonary exercise testing independently predicted coronary artery disease in patients with anginal chest pain (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.06-2.39; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) accurately identify coronary artery disease in patients with anginal chest pain and left bundle branch block?
Cohort (n=90)
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) accurately identify coronary artery disease in patients with anginal chest pain and left bundle branch block?
Time to reach the anaerobic threshold during cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a significant functional parameter for predicting coronary artery disease in patients with anginal chest pain and left bundle branch block.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used in cardiology to grade the severity of heart failure and to assess its prognosis. However, it is unknown whether CPET may be a useful technique to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with anginal chest pain and left bundle branch block (LBBB). The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CPET to identify CAD in these patients. A cohort of 90 patients with anginal chest pain, 45 with LBBB (group A) and 45 non-LBBB (group B), were studied with CPET and a single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion study during the same period. The following variables of CPET were analyzed: peak oxygen uptake (VO2), VO2 at anaerobic threshold, and time to reach the anaerobic threshold (TAT). Group A values were lower compared with group B in peak VO2 (23 ± 6.2 vs. 28 ± 7.6 mLO2 · kg · min; P = 0.002), VO2 at anaerobic threshold (16.1 ± 3.6 vs. 18.9 ± 4.1 mLO2 · kg · min; P =0.001), and TAT (2.7 ± 0.96 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1 min; P < 0.001). Group A showed higher perfusion abnormalities in myocardial perfusion study than group B [27 (60%) vs. 12 (26.7%); P = 0.003]. Multivariate analysis showed that TAT (odds ratio = 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.39; P = 0.02) was the only independent predictor of CAD, after controlling for other factors. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.78 for TAT (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.86; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, our findings suggest that a new functional parameter such as TAT significantly predicts CAD in patients with anginal chest pain and LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domínguez‐Rodríguez et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Anginal chest pain and left bundle branch block (n=90). Time to reach anaerobic threshold (TAT) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing was evaluated on Coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06-2.39, p=0.02). Time to reach the anaerobic threshold during cardiopulmonary exercise testing independently predicted coronary artery disease in patients with anginal chest pain (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.06-2.39; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: