Why the study?
Does adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT accurately diagnose coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and complete left bundle branch block?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
Does adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT accurately diagnose coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and complete left bundle branch block?
In hypertensive patients with LBBB and chest pain, considering only reversible perfusion defects in the LAD territory on adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT improves specificity and negative predictive value for diagnosing CAD.
Tc-99m SPECT may aid CAD diagnosis in hypertensive LBBB patients with chest pain; leaves open larger validation before changing practice.
PURPOSE: Hypertensive patients with complete left bundle branch block who experience chest pain present special problems in the radionuclide diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to assess the utility of Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT for the diagnosis of CAD in 35 hypertensive patients with left bundle branch block hospitalized for chest pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images were analyzed semiquantitatively for the presence of both fixed or reversible perfusion defects (method A) or only reversible defects (method B) in the distribution of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory. Perfusion defects observed in the territory of any other coronary artery were always considered. Thirty-five patients without infarction underwent adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT, transthoracic echocardiography, and coronary angiography. RESULTS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated as 39.9% +/- 11.6%, and the prevalence of CAD was 29%. The sensitivity of SPECT was identical for the two methods at 89%. The specificity increased 19% with method A and 54% with method B. The positive predictive value remained unsatisfactorily low with both methods (27% for method A and 40% for method B), and the negative predictive value improved from 83% with method A to 93% with method B. CONCLUSIONS: Only reversible perfusion defects in the LAD territory should be considered significant for CAD, and these patients should undergo coronary angiography. Reversible or fixed perfusion defects in the left circumflex and right coronary artery territories should be evaluated according to other clinical parameters (global left ventricular ejection fraction, extension of perfusion defects). The highly negative predictive value of adenosine SPECT could help in the exclusion of CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feola et al. (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with complete left bundle branch block and chest pain (n=35). Adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT vs. Coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: