Key result
Abnormal activation-related defects on MPS in patients with LBBB or RVA pacing were associated with a similar cumulative cardiac event-free follow-up compared to a normal MPS (93% vs 85%).
Why the study?
Does the presence of abnormal activation-related defects on MPS worsen prognosis compared to normal MPS in patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing?
Cohort (n=97)
Does the presence of abnormal activation-related defects on MPS worsen prognosis compared to normal MPS in patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing?
Absolute Event Rate: 93% vs 85%
Patients with LBBB or RVA pacing who show abnormal activation-related defects on MPS have a comparable prognosis to those with a normal MPS, supporting the use of MPS for risk stratification in this population.
Abnormal MPS defects may not worsen prognosis in LBBB or RVA pacing; leaves open MPS value for risk stratification in this population.
PURPOSE: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and ventricular pacing may induce typical artefacts that appear as perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS). We assessed the prognosis of patients with LBBB or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing who had chest pain and an MPS with only abnormal activation-related defects (AARD). METHODS: All patients with LBBB or ventricular pacing referred for vasodilator stress MPS between April 2002 and January 2006 were analyzed. AARD were defined as small, nontransmural, fixed defects and small reversible defects in well-defined regions always accompanied with concomitant wall motion abnormalities. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 3+/-1.3 years. MPS showed AARD in 57 and it was completely normal in 40 patients. No significant difference in cumulative cardiac event-free follow-up was observed between patients with AARD (93%) and normal MPS (85%). The average annual cardiac event rate was not significantly different between the groups (1.7 and 4.3% per year, respectively). No difference was found between patients with LBBB and RVA pacing. CONCLUSION: Patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing who show AARD on MPS have a comparable prognosis as patients with abnormal activation and a normal MPS. This justifies MPS for risk stratification of patients with chest pain and LBBB or RVA pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cate et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing with chest pain (n=97). Abnormal activation-related defects (AARD) on MPS vs. Normal MPS was evaluated on Cumulative cardiac event-free follow-up. Abnormal activation-related defects on MPS in patients with LBBB or RVA pacing were associated with a similar cumulative cardiac event-free follow-up compared to a normal MPS (93% vs 85%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: