Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To describe the feasibility of balloon angioplasty using a long balloon for chronic femoropopliteal occlusions by evaluating angiographic dissection patterns for optimization of outcomes in balloon angioplasty. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis examined 101 symptomatic patients (mean age 75.6±9.9 years; 65 men) with single de novo femoropopliteal occlusive lesions treated with balloon angioplasty between August 2012 and October 2016. The patients were classified into 2 groups for comparison of angiographic dissection patterns: 51 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty using long balloons (L-BA; defined as ≥220 mm in length) and 50 patients were treated with short balloon angioplasty (S-BA; defined as <150-mm-long balloons). RESULTS: Severe vessel dissection patterns, defined as type C or higher, were fewer in the L-BA group (47.1% vs 70.0% in the S-BA group, p=0.019) and the total dissection length was shorter (92.7±72.6 vs 160.4±84.6 mm in the S-BA group, p<0.001). Although the results showed no significant differences between the two groups regarding the length of chronic total occlusions (L-BA: 228.6±73.2 vs S-BA: 226.0±53.8 mm, p=0.83), inflation pressure (L-BA; 8.2±2.6 vs S-BA: 8.1±2.9 atm, p=0.86), and the other lesion characteristics, inflation time was significantly longer in the L-BA group (161.2±68.7 seconds vs 51.1±54.0 seconds in the S-BA group, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a balloon length ≥220 mm as an independent negative predictor of severe vessel dissection (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.83, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Using long balloons for balloon angioplasty may help prevent severe vessel dissection in chronic femoropopliteal occlusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: