Why the study?
Does cross-sectional echocardiography improve the detection and characterization of left atrial ball thrombus compared to M-mode imaging?
Case Report (n=2)
Does cross-sectional echocardiography improve the detection and characterization of left atrial ball thrombus compared to M-mode imaging?
Cross-sectional echocardiography is superior to M-mode for detecting left atrial ball thrombi, which require emergency surgical intervention regardless of apparent mobility to prevent fatal mitral valve obstruction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance left atrial ball thrombus detection over M-mode; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The echocardiographic features of left atrial ball thrombus associated with mitral stenosis are reviewed, and some previously unpublished cross-sectional echocardiographic findings presented. In one patient who had a large free-floating ball thrombus there was variation in its echocardiographic appearance; the thrombus was removed uneventfully at surgery. In another patient who had a pedunculated but immobile ball thrombus, a stalk was identified which attached it to the inter-atrial septum; this patient died suddenly before surgery could be performed, due to detachment of the thrombus and obstruction of the mitral valve orifice. Cross-sectional echocardiography is clearly superior to M-mode imaging in the detection of atrial thrombi, and variable appearances may help differentiation of thrombus from myxoma. Whether or not a ball thrombus appears mobile, emergency thrombectomy and mitral valve replacement is indicated, because of the risk of obstruction of the mitral valve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fraser et al. (1988) conducted a case report in Left atrial ball thrombus associated with mitral stenosis (n=2). Cross-sectional echocardiography vs. M-mode imaging was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: