The compounds Ru2[(XC6H4)NCHN(XC6H4)]4(CCPh)2 (X = p-OMe, H, p-Cl, m-Cl, m-CF3, 3,4-Cl2 or 3,5-Cl2) have been synthesized and characterized. These diamagnetic diruthenium(III) compounds display three (quasi)reversible redox couples: Ru27+–Ru26+ (A), Ru26+–Ru25+ (B) and Ru25+–Ru24+ (C). The electrode potential for each couple across the series linearly correlates with the Hammett constant (σ) of the substituent according to the following equation: ΔE½ = E½(X) – E½(H) = ρ(8σ) with ρ = 72.0, 92.4 and 80.5 mV for A, B and C, respectively, and the average HOMO–LUMO gap for the solvated diruthenium compounds is estimated as 1.35 eV. Consistent with the proposed ground-state configuration π4δ2π*4, a very long Ru–Ru bond (2.5554 Å) was revealed by an X-ray diffraction study of the compound with X = p-Cl, where unusual structural distortions in both the bridging and axial ligands were also observed. The origin of the distortions is attributed to the second-order Jahn–Teller effect, as elucidated from an MO analysis based on Fenske–Hall calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: