Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cu2O/N–TiO2 was achieved through a two-step route by deposition of CuO on Degussa P25 TiO2 using a wet impregnation method and then treatment with N2/Ar plasma. The morphology, composition, and structure of the prepared catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). XRD spectra indicated that neither the low-content copper oxides nor the plasma treatment changed the crystalline phase of TiO2. XPS results indicated the transformation of Cu species from CuO to Cu2O and the doping of N after plasma treatment. EPR spectra confirmed the formation of Ti3+ that was also induced by plasma treatment. TEM analysis revealed that the well crystallized Cu2O nanoparticles, existed with sizes of ∼3 nm, dispersed uniformly on the surface of TiO2. As for the optical absorption curves obtained by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, an extended absorption edge of Cu2O/N–TiO2 was confirmed compared with that of TiO2 and CuO/TiO2. In addition, the photodegradation efficiency of methyl orange (MO) solutions over Cu2O/N–TiO2 were markedly enhanced under both the visible and full-spectrum light irradiation in comparison with TiO2 and CuO/TiO2. The mechanism of photocatalytic reaction over Cu2O/N–TiO2 corresponding to UV and visible light irradiation was discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: