Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the effects of fixed and removable space-maintainers on halitosis and oral health of children. METHODS: Forty-three patients randomly selected between the ages 4-10 whom fixed or removable space maintainers were indicated in Gazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics. The inclusing criteria were: caries-free (with/without restorations), with absence of periodontal diseases, without systematic disease, no mouth breathing and no use of antibiotics the 2-months period before the study. The patients were subdivided into two groups: the group treated with fixed space maintainers (group 1, n = 27), the group treated with removable space maintainers (group 2, n = 16). The the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), periodontal screening index (PSI), tongue coating index (TCI) records and the halitosis measurements were obtained at three time periods (T1: immediately after application, T2: 1 week after application, T3: 5 weeks after application). The measurement values of T1 served as control. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the PI, GI, PSI, TCI and halitosis measurements between T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 in both appliance groups and between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The fixed and removable space maintainers did not affect oral health status and halitosis significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keriş et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: