Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chelate complexation of 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-(6-methyl-2-pyridyl)imidazolin-1-oxyl 3-oxide (NITmepy) and 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-(6-methyl-2-pyridyl)imidazolin-1-oxyl (IMmepy) to cobalt(II) chloride (bromide) or zinc(II) chloride afforded tetrahedral four-co-ordinate (T-4) complexes, [MX2(NITmepy)] and [MX2(IMmepy)] (MX = CoCl (1 and 2), CoBr (1Br and 2Br) or ZnCl (3 and 4), respectively) containing either a six- or a five-membered chelate ring as determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. The formation of such T-4 complexes arises from the steric requirements of the methyl group at the o-position of the pyridyl-N donor. The UV-vis-NIR spectra suggest that both complexes 1 and 2 in dichloromethane retain their solid state structure. In acetonitrile, however, 1 exists as an equilibrium mixture due to dissociation of the co-ordinated NITmepy, while 2 is stable. The ligand-field spin-allowed and spin-forbidden d–d transitions of 1 and 2 are not influenced by the coordinated radical ligands. The reaction of nickel(II) chloride and thiocyanate with IMmepy gave a dichloro-bridged dinuclear complex with a square pyramidal five-co-ordinate (SPR-5) geometry and an OC-6 complex, respectively, [{NiCl(IMmepy)}2(μ-Cl)2] (5) and [Ni(NCS)2(IMmepy)2] (6). The intramolecular magnetic interactions in 1 and 2 are estimated to be antiferromagnetic, whereas 5 and 6 give ferromagnetic interactions. Complex 3, with one-dimensional columns, forms a dimer so that a moderate intermolecular antiferromagnetic coupling is demonstrated, while complex 4 exists as a discrete molecule in the crystal and shows paramagnetic behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: