Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aimed to investigate the long-term motor outcome according to early diffusion tensor tractography findings for the affected corticospinal tract (CST) in poststroke hemiplegic patients. A total of 48 supratentorial subacute patients after stroke were enrolled, who had a brain MRI scan within 6 weeks from onset, and no stroke recurrence reported within the 2-year follow-up period. Diffusion tensor images were obtained and CSTs were reconstructed. The participants were classified into three groups: type A, the CST originating from the primary motor cortex was preserved around the lesion area; type B, the CST was similar to type A, except that the fiber originated from the area adjacent to the primary motor cortex; and type C, the CST was interrupted or not shown. Motor functions using Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), the Box and Block Test (BBT), and Functional Ambulation Category, and cognitive function using Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) were measured at baseline and at 2 years from stroke onset. Changes in FMA and BBT were significantly different according to diffusion tensor tractography type at follow-up (P<0.05), but Functional Ambulation Category and Mini-Mental Status Examination were not. In post-hoc analysis, groups A and B showed greater significant improvements on the BBT and on the upper FMA subscale (shoulder/elbow, wrist, and hand) compared with group C (corrected P<0.05), but did not on lower FMA. This study showed the importance of CST integrity for stoke motor recovery. The early integrity of the CST may be useful in predicting long-term motor outcomes, specifically with motor recovery of the upper extremity and hand function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: