Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up. Methods Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman’s correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid. Results At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection ( r (18) = −0.96, p < 0.001) and 5 % dextrose in water hydrodissection ( r (18) = -0.81, p < 0.001), which differs significantly ( p = 0.011). Conclusion Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erp et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: