Key result
The estimated 90% effective dose (ED90) of intermittent intravenous norepinephrine boluses to prevent spinal-induced hypotension during elective cesarean delivery was compared between the groups.
Why the study?
What is the effective dose (ED90) of intermittent IV norepinephrine boluses to prevent postspinal hypotension in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery?
RCT (n=40)
Double-blind
biased coin up-and-down design
What is the effective dose (ED90) of intermittent IV norepinephrine boluses to prevent postspinal hypotension in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery?
An intermittent IV norepinephrine bolus dose of approximately 6 µg is effective for preventing spinal-induced hypotension during elective cesarean delivery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ~6 µg norepinephrine boluses to prevent postspinal hypotension in cesarean delivery; provides precise ED90 benchmark for obstetric vasopressor trials.
BACKGROUND: The use of phenylephrine as the first-line agent for prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery (CD) may reduce cardiac output, posing a theoretical risk to mother and fetus. Norepinephrine has been suggested as a potential alternative, because its β-adrenergic effects might result in greater heart rate and cardiac output than phenylephrine. The use of norepinephrine to prevent and treat hypotension during CD is new, and its use as a bolus has not been fully determined in this context. The purpose of this study was to determine the effective norepinephrine dose, when given as intermittent intravenous (IV) boluses, to prevent postspinal hypotension in 90% of women undergoing elective CD (ED90). METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind sequential allocation dose-finding study, using the biased coin up-and-down design. Forty-term pregnant women undergoing elective CD under spinal anesthesia received a set intermittent norepinephrine bolus of either 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 µg every time their systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell to below 100% of baseline. The primary outcome was the success of the norepinephrine regimen to maintain SBP at or above 80% of baseline, from induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery of the fetus. Secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, hypertension (SBP > 120% of baseline), bradycardia (<50 bpm), upper sensory level of anesthesia to ice cold and umbilical artery and vein blood gases. The ED90 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using both truncated Dixon and Mood and isotonic regression methods. RESULTS: The estimated ED90 of norepinephrine was 5.49 µg (95% CI, 5.15-5.83) using the truncated Dixon and Mood method and 5.80 µg (95% CI, 5.01-6.59) using the isotonic regression method. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intermittent IV norepinephrine boluses to prevent spinal-induced hypotension in elective CD seems feasible and was not observed to be associated with adverse outcomes. Practically, we suggest an ED90 dose of 6 µg. Further work is warranted to elucidate the comparative effects of intermittent IV bolus doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine, in terms of efficacy and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onwochei et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Spinal-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery (n=40). Norepinephrine was evaluated on Success of the norepinephrine regimen to maintain SBP at or above 80% of baseline (ED90) (ED90 5.49 µg, 95% CI 5.15-5.83). The estimated 90% effective dose (ED90) of intermittent intravenous norepinephrine boluses to prevent spinal-induced hypotension during elective cesarean delivery was compared between the groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: