Huge amounts of generated non-degradable plastic wastes constitute a major global environmental nuisance. The combined annual municipal solid waste (MSW) generation of Saudi Arabian Kingdom (KSA) exceeds 14,000,000 tonnes, with an average per capita of 1.4 kg/day. Plastic wastes constitute up to 10% of these MSW. The local asphalt can only perform satisfactorily without polymer modification in an environment with a maximum pavement temperature below 64°C. But the 7-day maximum pavement temperature ranges between 64°C and 76°C within the Kingdom. Dynamic storage stability, high-temperature performance, non-recoverable creep compliance (Jnr), and strain recovering tendency of recycled high- and low-density polyethylene (RHDPE and RLDPE), and recycled polypropylene-(RPP) modified asphalt binders in combination with styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) and polybilt (PB) were presented in this study. Improved high-temperature performance was observed. Even though the recycled plastic waste-modified binders lack sufficient strain recovering ability, RLDPE and RHDPE could be utilised along with an elastomeric SBS to achieve a higher recovery and strain resistance, than that which could be achieved if the same amount of SBS alone is used. RPP content above 2% will lead to an unstable modified asphalt binder. The RHDPE content below 4% and the RLDPE content below 6% whether containing either SBS or PB have shown good storage stability trait under mild agitation, in terms of both time degradation and separation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahhab et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: