Key result
RV global longitudinal strain showed a significant inverse correlation with CMR-derived RV ejection fraction (r=-0.62, p=0.002) and demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting RV dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does echocardiographic strain imaging correlate with CMR in assessing RV function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot?
Cross-Sectional (n=22)
No
Does echocardiographic strain imaging correlate with CMR in assessing RV function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot?
Effect estimate: r=-0.62
p-value: p=0.002
Echocardiographic strain imaging is a feasible and highly sensitive/specific screening tool for detecting RV dysfunction in repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients compared to CMR.
Supports strain as potential RV screening correlate in repaired tetralogy of Fallot; leaves open prospective outcome validation versus CMR.
Background: Strain imaging offers an alternative non-invasive method to quantify right ventricular (RV) function. This study aims to utilize strain imaging in the assessment of RV function among repaired tetralogy of Fallot patients in order to determine clinical RV dysfunction. Methodology: This is a prospective cross-sectional study done at the Philippine Heart Center. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and echocardiographic strain imaging were done on the same day for each study participant. Statistical comparison was performed. Sensitivity and specificity curves (using CMR-derived RV ejection fraction [RVEF] as the reference test) was used to determine optimal cut off values for global and regional longitudinal systolic strain and strain rate. Intra-observer variability was also determined. Results: Twenty-two participants were included. There was significant inverse moderate correlation between CMR-derived RVEF and RV free wall (RVFW) mid-segment strain (r=–0.42; p=0.05) and global longitudinal strain (r= 0.62; p=0.002). The determined cut-off for RV dysfunction for RV global longitudinal strain was –20.66%, which showed a sensitivity of 88.83%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.83%. RVFW mid-segment strain determined cut-off was –16.25, which showed a sensitivity of 83.33%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100% and NPV of 83.33%. Conclusion: Strain imaging is an easy, feasible and reproducible parameter in two-dimensional echocardiography that can be a good screening tool, with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting RV dysfunction among patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorielyn G Mandigma (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (n=22). RV strain imaging vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was evaluated on Correlation between CMR-derived RV ejection fraction and RV global longitudinal strain (r=-0.62, p=0.002). RV global longitudinal strain showed a significant inverse correlation with CMR-derived RV ejection fraction (r=-0.62, p=0.002) and demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting RV dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: