Key result
Heterologous boosting with the RQ3013 mRNA vaccine reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the ZF2001 vaccine (relative efficacy 51.7%; 95% CI 30.9-66.2%; p<.001).
Why the study?
Does RQ3013 prevent PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to ZF2001 in adults previously vaccinated with three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines?
RCT (n=6,336)
Double-blind
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does RQ3013 prevent PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to ZF2001 in adults previously vaccinated with three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines?
Effect estimate: Relative efficacy 51.7% (95% CI 30.9-66.2%)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.7% vs 11.8%
p-value: p=<.001
Heterologous boosting with the RQ3013 mRNA vaccine provided significantly greater protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the ZF2001 subunit vaccine.
Chimeric mRNA booster halves symptomatic infections versus ZF2001; extends RCT evidence for heterologous boosting after inactivated vaccines.
A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted during a COVID-19 outbreak after the initial, stringent zero-Covid policy was relaxed in three provinces. Eligible adults aged ≥18 years who had received three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines 6 months earlier were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either one intramuscular injection of RQ3013 or ZF2001 vaccine. The primary end point was protection against PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with onset at least 7 days after the booster. A total of 3,167 and 3,169 eligible participants received one dose of RQ3013 or ZF2001 vaccine, respectively. COVID-19 illness was confirmed in 91 participants in the ZF2001 group (11.8 per 100 person years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.6–14.6) and in 45 participants in the RQ3013 group (5.7 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 4.3–7.7) during a 4-month follow-up, resulting in a relative efficacy of 51.7% (95% CI, 30.9–66.2%) (p < .001) in an intention-to-treat analysis. The RQ3013 vaccine was also found to be significantly more immunogenic against omicron BA.5 compared to the ZF2001 vaccine. Moderate, transient adverse reaction after vaccination occurred more frequently in the RQ3013 group than in the ZF2001 group. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were rare and occurred almost equally in two groups. All SAEs were not related to the vaccination. These findings suggest that a chimeric mRNA vaccine design involving multiple antigenic epitopes provides broader protection across subvariants and variants of SARS-CoV-2 than the subunit vaccine ZF2001.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in COVID-19 (n=6,336). RQ3013 vs. ZF2001 vaccine was evaluated on PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with onset at least 7 days after the booster (Relative efficacy 51.7%, 95% CI 30.9-66.2%, p=<.001). Heterologous boosting with the RQ3013 mRNA vaccine reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the ZF2001 vaccine (relative efficacy 51.7%; 95% CI 30.9-66.2%; p<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: