This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) is a widely recognized tool for assessing state and trait anxiety components in the general population. While reliable and valid, each scale in the STAI has 20 items, which limits its usability in certain real-world clinical settings. Additionally, certain items can inaccurately increase anxiety scores among expectant women. This study aimed to develop a concise yet dependable and valid version of these scales tailored for pregnant individuals. We engaged 1,158 expectant women who completed the STAI and other assessments to determine criterion validity. Our methodology incorporated item response theory to select the most discriminating items for pregnant people, confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the fit of the factor solution for the abbreviated versions, and k-fold cross-validation to ensure the robustness of the models. Additionally, Bland-Altman regressions and plots assisted in gauging score accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic analyses determined discriminative validity. We also set clinical change benchmarks. The resulting five-item STAI short forms manifested robust psychometric attributes and reliability, providing a theoretically grounded and reliable anxiety assessment during pregnancy. This can be effectively applied in obstetric and gynecological settings, offering a streamlined response experience for expectant women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefana et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: