Key result
The point-of-care NT-proBNP ELISA differentiated cats with cardiac disease from healthy controls with a sensitivity of 65.4% and a specificity of 100%.
Why the study?
Does a point-of-care NT-proBNP ELISA accurately identify cardiac disease in cats?
Cross-Sectional (n=53)
Single-blind
No
Does a point-of-care NT-proBNP ELISA accurately identify cardiac disease in cats?
The point-of-care NT-proBNP ELISA has high specificity but moderate sensitivity for detecting cardiac disease in cats, meaning a positive result is highly indicative of disease but a negative result cannot rule it out.
BACKGROUND: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations may be increased in cats with various cardiac disorders. The point-of-care (POC) ELISA assay uses the same biologic reagents as the quantitative NT-proBNP ELISA. Previous studies have evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the POC ELISA in cats with cardiac disease. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic utility of the POC ELISA in a select population of cats. ANIMALS: Thirty-eight client-owned cats presented to the University of Florida Cardiology Service for cardiac evaluation. Fifteen apparently healthy cats recruited as part of another study. METHODS: Physical examination and echocardiography were performed in all cats. The POC ELISA was assessed visually as either positive or negative by a reader blinded to the echocardiographic findings, and results were analyzed relative to quantitative assay results. RESULTS: Twenty-six cats were diagnosed with underlying cardiac disease, and 27 cats were considered free of cardiac disease. Cats with cardiac disease included: 21 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 2 with unclassified cardiomyopathy, 2 with restrictive cardiomyopathy, and 1 with 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV) block. The POC ELISA differentiated cats with cardiac disease with a sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The POC NT-proBNP ELISA performed moderately well in a selected population of cats. A negative test result cannot exclude the presence of underlying cardiac disease, and a positive test result indicates that cardiac disease likely is present, but further diagnostic investigation would be indicated for a definitive diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beatty et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac disease (n=53). Point-of-care (POC) NT-proBNP ELISA vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Differentiation of cats with cardiac disease (sensitivity and specificity). The point-of-care NT-proBNP ELISA differentiated cats with cardiac disease from healthy controls with a sensitivity of 65.4% and a specificity of 100%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: