Key result
Fluvastatin 80 mg/day did not reduce the progression of mean arterial intimal volume fraction compared to placebo at 6 months (6.9% vs. 6.9%; P=ns).
Why the study?
Does fluvastatin 80 mg/day reduce the progression of renal transplant vasculopathy in renal transplant patients?
RCT (n=89)
Double-blind
Stratified according to donor age
Yes
Does fluvastatin 80 mg/day reduce the progression of renal transplant vasculopathy in renal transplant patients?
Fluvastatin did not reduce the primary histomorphometric measure of intimal volume fraction progression but was associated with a reduced incidence of transplant vasculopathy by Banff criteria at 6 months.
BACKGROUND: Statins prevent the progression of transplant vasculopathy in heart transplants, but its beneficial effect on the transplanted kidney is controversial. METHODS: The aim is to evaluate the utility of fluvastatin 80 mg/day to reduce the progression of 6-month renal transplant vasculopathy in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial stratified according to donor age. All patients received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The progression of transplant vasculopathy was evaluated in paired donor and 6-month protocol biopsies. The primary efficacy variable was the progression of mean arterial intimal volume fraction (deltaVvintima/artery) evaluated with histomorphometry. The minimum sample size to detect a 50% reduction in the progression of deltaVvintima/artery was 62 patients per group. The secondary efficacy variable included the incidence of transplant vasculopathy evaluated according to Banff criteria. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were included, 74 completed the 6-month study and 57 have paired biopsies with sufficient tissue for histological evaluation. The deltaVvintima/artery was not different between treatment and placebo groups (6.9+/-8.2% vs. 6.9+/-7.4%, P=ns), whereas the incidence of transplant vasculopathy was lower in the fluvastatin group (7% vs. 33%; P=0.02). Because there was a discrepancy between the primary and secondary efficacy variables, post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate the reproducibility of both variables in a subset of 50 biopsies. The reproducibility of transplant vasculopathy was higher than the reproducibility of Vvintima/artery (kappa 0.86 vs. 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, there were no differences in deltaVvintima/artery between groups, but fluvastatin treatment was associated with a reduced incidence of transplant vasculopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serón et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Renal transplant vasculopathy (n=89). Fluvastatin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Progression of mean arterial intimal volume fraction (deltaVvintima/artery) (p=ns). Fluvastatin 80 mg/day did not reduce the progression of mean arterial intimal volume fraction compared to placebo at 6 months (6.9% vs. 6.9%; P=ns).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: