Key result
The GLU-Oneformer model with a non-hair-bearing EEG montage achieved a driving fatigue detection accuracy of 86.97%, improving upon the 76.47% accuracy of the previous random forest model.
Why the study?
Practical EEG-based driving fatigue detection using a non-hair-bearing montage previously yielded limited recognition accuracy.
Absolute Event Rate: 86.97% vs 76.47%
The proposed GLU-Oneformer model combined with a non-hair-bearing EEG montage improves the accuracy of driving fatigue detection to 86.97%.
NHB-EEG fatigue detection reaches 87% accuracy with modified transformer; leaves open real-road validation before any clinical use.
Driving fatigue is the main cause of traffic accidents, which seriously affects people's life and property safety. Many researchers have applied electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for driving fatigue detection to reduce negative effects. The main challenges are the practicality and accuracy of the EEG-based driving fatigue detection method when it is applied on the real road. In our previous study, we attempted to improve the practicality of fatigue detection based on the proposed non-hair-bearing (NHB) montage with fewer EEG channels, but the recognition accuracy was only 76.47% with the random forest (RF) model. In order to improve the accuracy with NHB montage, this study proposed an improved transformer architecture for one-dimensional feature vector classification based on introducing the Gated Linear Unit (GLU) in the Attention sub-block and Feed-Forward Networks (FFN) sub-block of a transformer, called GLU-Oneformer. Moreover, we constructed an NHB-EEG-based feature set, including the same EEG features (power ratio, approximate entropy, and mutual information (MI)) in our previous study, and the lateralization features of the power ratio and approximate entropy based on the strategy of brain lateralization. The results indicated that our GLU-Oneformer method significantly improved the recognition performance and achieved an accuracy of 86.97%. Our framework demonstrated that the combination of the NHB montage and the proposed GLU-Oneformer model could well support driving fatigue detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied Driving fatigue. GLU-Oneformer model with non-hair-bearing (NHB) EEG montage vs. Random forest (RF) model was evaluated on Recognition accuracy for driving fatigue detection. The GLU-Oneformer model with a non-hair-bearing EEG montage achieved a driving fatigue detection accuracy of 86.97%, improving upon the 76.47% accuracy of the previous random forest model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: