Key result
Chronic kidney disease was associated with a higher 1-year risk of death after primary prevention ICD placement compared to no CKD, with mortality reaching 22.4% in ESRD vs 4.4% (HR 4.80; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does chronic kidney disease severity increase the risk of death in patients receiving primary prevention ICDs?
Cohort (n=47,282)
Yes
Does chronic kidney disease severity increase the risk of death in patients receiving primary prevention ICDs?
Hazard Ratio: 2.08 (95% CI 1.99–2.18)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 4.4%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Advanced CKD is associated with high 1-year mortality after primary prevention ICD placement, suggesting these patients may not meet the guideline-recommended >1 year longevity threshold for ICD candidacy.
Advanced CKD was associated with high 1-year post-ICD mortality; leaves open whether primary prevention ICDs confer net benefit in this population.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) candidates have an estimated longevity of ≥1 year. Longevity can be affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD registry linked with the Social Security Death Master File, we assessed the rate of death after primary prevention ICD placement between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007, according to CKD stage. Using Cox models, we identified factors associated with death among patients with CKD. Compared with patients without CKD (n=26,056), those with CKD (n=21,226) were older, less commonly men, more often white, and more frequently had comorbid illness. Compared with patients without CKD, patients with a glomerular filtration rate 30 to 60, glomerular filtration rate <30, and end-stage renal disease on dialysis had a higher risk of death after ICD placement (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-2.18; P<0.0001; hazard ratio, 4.20; 95% confidence interval, 3.92-4.50; P<0.0001; and hazard ratio, 4.80; 95% confidence interval, 4.46-5.17; P<0.0001, respectively). Corresponding 1-year death rates were 4.4%, 9.1%, 20.2%, and 22.4%. Among patients with CKD, factors associated with increased risk of death included CKD severity, age >65 years, heart failure symptoms, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, serum sodium <140 mEq/L, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and a lower ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of death after primary prevention ICD placement is proportional to CKD severity. Among patients with CKD, several factors are prognostically significant and could inform clinical decision making on primary prevention ICD candidacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hess et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease in primary prevention ICD candidates (n=47,282). Chronic kidney disease (GFR 30-60) vs. No chronic kidney disease was evaluated on Death after primary prevention ICD placement (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.99-2.18, p=<0.0001). Chronic kidney disease was associated with a higher 1-year risk of death after primary prevention ICD placement compared to no CKD, with mortality reaching 22.4% in ESRD vs 4.4% (HR 4.80; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: