Key result
Postoperative peritonitis was associated with a 35.7% mortality rate and a 50% complication rate, with advanced age and delayed consultation significantly increasing the risk of complications.
Observational (n=14)
No
Postoperative peritonitis is a rare (0.9%) but serious complication of abdominal surgery, with age and delay before consultation significantly associated with complications.
Highlights risk factors and outcomes in postoperative peritonitis; leaves open need for prospective validation before guiding practice.
Introduction: Postoperative peritonitis is a serious complication occurring after abdominal surgery, usually digestive. Like all diseases associated with care, its prognosis is often severe, marked by high morbidity, prolonged stays in intensive care and in hospital, and potentially serious sequelae. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients operated on in the visceral surgical emergency department with a passage to the visceral surgical emergency department for postoperative peritonitis from January 2021 to November 2022. Results: From January 2021 to November 2022 we operated 1493 patients including 14 postoperative peritonitis, i.e. 0.9%. Among the 14 patients: 4 were women (28.6%) and 10 were men (71.4%) with a sex ratio of 2.5. Occlusions were the dominant pathology. The multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship between age, delay before consultation and the occurrence of complications. Conclusion: PPO still have a high mortality but which continues to decrease thanks to an effective medical and surgical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iliass et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Postoperative peritonitis (n=14). Postoperative peritonitis was evaluated on Mortality and complications. Postoperative peritonitis was associated with a 35.7% mortality rate and a 50% complication rate, with advanced age and delayed consultation significantly increasing the risk of complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: