Key result
The nine-test screening battery (9SB) failed to predict the risk of non-contact new injury or substantial injury in adolescent elite handball players (AUC 0.50 to 0.59).
Why the study?
The predictive value of the nine-test screening battery composite score and its underlying factors for non-contact injuries in adolescent elite handball players was unknown.
Does the nine-test screening battery (9SB) predict non-contact injuries in adolescent elite handball players?
Cohort (n=45)
Does the nine-test screening battery (9SB) predict non-contact injuries in adolescent elite handball players?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.50-0.59
The nine-test screening battery (9SB) does not predict non-contact injuries in adolescent elite handball players and is not recommended for this purpose.
9SB lacks predictive value for non-contact injury in adolescent handball players; leaves open whether refined movement screening improves risk stratification in youth athletes.
Introduction: The nine-test screening battery (9SB) consists of 11 tests used to assess injury risk in sports populations.Objectives: To evaluate the predictive value of the composite score and underlying factors of the 9SB for sustaining non-contact injury in adolescent elite handball players.Methods: Forty-five (23 females) adolescent elite handball players, median age 17 (range 16–18), pre-seasonally performed the 9SB, followed by weekly recordings of injuries for 52 weeks using a web-based questionnaire.Results: The median value for seasonal substantial injury prevalence was 22% (25-75th percentiles 6–41). An exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, complex movements, mobility, and lower extremity control, that explained a cumulative variance of 56%, where each factor contributed with 13–26% of the total variance. Based on the identified cutoff values, none of the factors or the complete 9SB could predict the risk of a non-contact new injury as well as the risk of reporting a substantial injury. Area under the curve values were ranged 0.50 to 0.59, with the corresponding 95% CI including 0.50 for all factors.Conclusion: Based on the limited predictive ability of the 9SB, it is not recommended that clinicians use the 9SB to predict injury in adolescent elite handball players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karlsson et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Injury risk in adolescent elite handball players (n=45). Nine-test screening battery (9SB) was evaluated on Non-contact new injury and substantial injury (AUC 0.50-0.59). The nine-test screening battery (9SB) failed to predict the risk of non-contact new injury or substantial injury in adolescent elite handball players (AUC 0.50 to 0.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: