Key result
Percutaneous closure of a large ventricular septal defect using a home-made fenestrated atrial septal occluder successfully reduced average pulmonary artery pressure to 30 mmHg at one month.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous closure with a manually fenestrated atrial septal occluder improve hemodynamics in a patient with a large VSD and severe pulmonary hypertension?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does percutaneous closure with a manually fenestrated atrial septal occluder improve hemodynamics in a patient with a large VSD and severe pulmonary hypertension?
A manually fenestrated atrial septal occluder can be safely used to close a large VSD in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension, leading to improved hemodynamics.
May support individualized fenestrated closure in select large VSD-PH cases; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamically significant muscular ventricular septal defects in children after the infantile period are a rare occurrence and ideal for transcatheter closure. In cases of severe concomitant pulmonary hypertension, it may be necessary to fenestrate the device. In this report, we present an 18-year old patient with a large mid-trabecular ventricular septal defect and severe pulmonary hypertension that underwent percutaneous closure of the defect with a home-made fenestrated atrial septal occluder. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old female patient referred to us with complaints of dyspnea (NYHA score of 2-3). Physical examination revealed an apical rumble and a harsh second heart sound. Echocardiographic examination revealed a large mid-trabecular ventricular septal defect with bidirectional shunt and the widest diameter measuring 22 mm on 2D echocardiography. Left and right heart cavities were enlarged. Before and after the vasoreactivity test performed during cardiac catheterization, average aortic pressure was 65 → 86 mmHg, average pulmonary artery pressure: 58 → 73 mmHg, Qp/Qs: 1.6 → 3.2, PVR: 4.6 → 4.3 Wood/U/m2 and PVR/SVR: 0.5 → 0.2. On left-ventricular angiocardiogram, the largest end-diastolic defect diameter was 21 mm. The closure procedure was performed with transthoracic echocardiographic guidance, using a 24 mm Cera septal occluder and a 14 F sheath dilator to make a 4.5-5 mm opening. Measured immediately after the procedure and during cardiac catheterization one month later, average aortic pressure was 75 → 75 mmHg, average pulmonary artery pressure: 66 → 30 mmHg, Qp/Qs 1.5 → 1.4, PVR: 4.4 → 2.9 Wood/U/m2 and PVR/SVR: 0.4 → 0.2. Transthoracic echocardiographic examination performed 24 hours after the procedure showed a max 35-40 mmHg gradient between the left and right ventricles through the fenestration. After the procedure, we observed sporadic early ventricular systoles and a nodal rhythm disorder that started after approximately 12 hours and spontaneously reverted to normal 9 days later. CONCLUSION: In patients with large ventricular septal defects, large atrial septal occluders may be used. In cases with risk of pulmonary vascular disease, a safer option would be to close the defect using a manually fenestrated device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamalı et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Large ventricular septal defect with severe pulmonary hypertension (n=1). Percutaneous closure with home-made fenestrated atrial septal occluder was evaluated on Average pulmonary artery pressure. Percutaneous closure of a large ventricular septal defect using a home-made fenestrated atrial septal occluder successfully reduced average pulmonary artery pressure to 30 mmHg at one month.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: