Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We revisit the step bunching instability without recourse to the quasistatic approximation and show that the stability diagrams are significantly altered, even in the low-deposition regime where it was thought sufficient. In particular, steps are unstable against bunching for attachment-detachment limited growth. By accounting for the dynamics and chemical effects, we can explain the onset of step bunching in Si(111)-(7×7) and GaAs(001) without resort to the inverse Schwoebel barrier or step-edge diffusion. Further, the size-scaling analysis of step-bunch growth, as induced by these two combined effects, agrees with the bunching regime observed at 750 ^∘C in Si(111)-(7×7).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: