Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
132 patients with suspected kala-azar (visceral leishmaniasis) were included in a prospective study to compare the performance of the direct agglutination test (DAT) with smears of lymph node, bone marrow and splenic aspiration. A titre greater than 1:3200 was considered positive. 67 patients provided positive smears and 65 were smear-negative. Compared with the results obtained from smears, the sensitivity of the DAT was 94% and its specificity 72%. Of 18 patients who were negative by smears but positive by DAT, 3 were treated on strong clinical suspicion of kala-azar and responded well to therapy. One other patient had post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Of the remaining 14, 8 were tested with the leishmanin skin test; 6 gave a positive result, suggesting past or sub-clinical infection. In 4 smear-positive patients, the DAT was negative; in 2 of these, the test remained negative during 6 months' follow-up. In a sero-epidemiological survey in a camp for displaced people, 30 of 600 sampled individuals gave a positive DAT. Of these, 11 had been treated for kala-azar; 4 others were leishmanin positive. The DAT is a useful screening test (sensitivity 94%; predictive value of a negative test 92%), but it does not differentiate between past kala-azar, sub-clinical infection and active disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zijlstra et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: