Key result
Right ventricular presystolic peak velocity was significantly reduced in patients with RV dysfunction compared to those with preserved RV function (16.48 vs. 23.98 cm/s; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does right ventricular presystolic peak velocity (RVPrP) measured with Doppler tissue imaging detect right ventricular dysfunction in stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Cross-Sectional (n=436)
Does right ventricular presystolic peak velocity (RVPrP) measured with Doppler tissue imaging detect right ventricular dysfunction in stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Right ventricular presystolic peak velocity (RVPrP) measured by Doppler tissue imaging is a useful echocardiographic parameter for detecting right ventricular dysfunction in stable patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RVPrP may identify RV dysfunction on tissue Doppler in stable patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) function is difficult to be measured but plays a role in morbility and mortality of patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, so many echocardiographic parameters have been developed from M-mode, B-mode and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) evaluation. Right ventricular presystolic peak velocity (RVPrP) measured with DTI of the tricuspidal annulus and its changes in RV dysfunction have never been assessed in a patient's cohort of stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors. RVPrP velocity could have a role in RV function evaluation; this study addresses such issue. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-six consecutive patients were submitted to a complete echocardiographic examination with the contemporary evaluation of the following RV function indexes: Tricuspid Annulus Plane Systolic Excurtion (TAPSE), RV Systolic Peak (RVSyP) and RVPrP. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), left ventricular and RV diastolic function were also evaluated. RESULTS: According to TAPSE and RVSyP taken alone or in combination, 113 patients had RV dysfunction, while 323 patients had normal RV function. RVPrP was reduced in patient's group with RV dysfunction with respect to patient's group with preserved RV function (16.48±7.3 cm/s vs. 23.98±8.4 cm/s, respectively, P<0.001). RVPrP was related with RVSyP (P<0.001) and with TAPSE (P=0.002). TAPSE and RVSyP revealed a poor concordance to define RV dysfunction. PASP was higher in patient's group with reduced RV function (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed RVPrP able to detect stable patients with RV dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giovanardi et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors (n=436). Right ventricular dysfunction vs. Preserved right ventricular function was evaluated on Right ventricular presystolic peak velocity (RVPrP) (p=<0.001). Right ventricular presystolic peak velocity was significantly reduced in patients with RV dysfunction compared to those with preserved RV function (16.48 vs. 23.98 cm/s; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: