Key result
Echocardiographic parameters, such as a left atrium diameter greater than 45 mm, were associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation compared to nutritional status parameters like visceral adiposity.
Why the study?
Both nutritional status and echocardiographic parameters are associated with AF risk, but the relationships between transthoracic echocardiography parameters and nutritional status assessment as risk factors for AF required determination.
Are echocardiographic and body composition parameters associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=360)
No
Are echocardiographic and body composition parameters associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Echocardiographic cut-off values, such as left atrial diameter > 45mm, are stronger predictors of atrial fibrillation risk than body composition parameters like visceral adipose tissue score.
Purpose: Both nutritional status and echocardiographic parameters are associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationships between parameters of transthoracic echocardiography and nutritional status assessment as risk factors for AF. Methods: This cross-sectional study considered 120 consecutive patients hospitalized due to AF and 240 inpatients admitted due to exacerbation of cardiovascular conditions. Echocardiographic parameters and parameters of nutritional status were determined for each patient. Results: Patients in the lowest body mass index (BMI) quartile and without visceral adiposity had the lowest standard echocardiographic parameters; however, the majority of these differences disappeared after the parameters were indexed to BSA. In logistic regression analysis, echocardiographic parameters were associated with slightly higher or similar AF risk comparing with parameters of nutritional status assessment. When the comparison was made in relation to cut-off values obtained in ROC analysis, then having a visceral adipose tissue (VAT) score ≥ 12 was associated with a lower increase in AF risk (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.09; 1.85–5.15) than the risk increase associated with e.g. left atrium diameter greater than 45mm ([OR; 95% CI] 10.483; 6.308–17.421). Conclusions: The unitary values of echocardiographic and body composition parameters only slightly differed in relation to the risk of AF occurrence, however, the use of cut-off values significantly increases an impact of echocardiography on the prediction of AF. The U-shaped relationships between a patient’s nutritional status and AF occurrence cannot be explained by the effect of body mass on cardiac structure and size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anaszewicz et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=360). Left atrium diameter ≥ 45 mm vs. Left atrium diameter < 45 mm was evaluated on Risk of atrial fibrillation occurrence (OR 10.483, 95% CI 6.308-17.421). Echocardiographic parameters, such as a left atrium diameter greater than 45 mm, were associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation compared to nutritional status parameters like visceral adiposity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: