Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conflict between stakeholders can impede implementation of national forest management plans, as was the case in the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont. To promote discussion among stakeholders, several meetings were held, some of which provided an opportunity to examine the role of science in resource planning. Credible scientists with different perspectives gave presentations and engaged in discussion with stakeholders. Findings suggest that stakeholders may attempt to use science to exacerbate controversy; however, facilitators can structure meetings so that science can play a positive role, resulting in stakeholder learning and shifts in perspective. In this Vermont example, direct interaction with scientists appeared to have been a key component of stakeholder learning. Given the need for credible science in policy and planning debates, this finding has important implications for scientists seeking to disseminate research results in ways that will impact management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chase et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: