Key result
Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training reduced pain ratings and central-heart rate connectivity in good responders, whereas the sham group experienced no changes.
Why the study?
Neurofeedback can induce long-term changes in brain functional connectivity, but its influence on connectivity between different physiological systems is unknown.
Does sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training alter EEG-heart rate connectivity and reduce pain in patients with fibromyalgia?
RCT (n=17)
Does sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training alter EEG-heart rate connectivity and reduce pain in patients with fibromyalgia?
Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training may reduce pain in fibromyalgia patients by altering the connectivity between the central nervous system and heart rate.
May support SMR neurofeedback trials in fibromyalgia responders; leaves open whether central-HR connectivity mediates pain relief.
OBJECTIVES: Neurofeedback can induce long-term changes in brain functional connectivity, but its influence on the connectivity between different physiological systems is unknown. The present paper is an ancillary study of a previous paper that confirmed the effect of neurofeedback on brain connectivity associated with chronic pain. We analysed the influence of neurofeedback on the connectivity between the electroencephalograph (EEG) and heart rate (HR). METHODS: Seventeen patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia were divided into three groups: good sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) training responders (n = 4), bad SMR responders (n = 5) and fake training (SHAM, n = 8). Training consisted of six sessions in which participants learned to synchronize and desynchronize SMR power. Before the first training (pre-resting state) and sixth training (post-resting state) session, open-eye resting-state EEG and electrocardiograph signals were recorded. RESULTS: Good responders reduced pain ratings after SMR neurofeedback training. This improvement in fibromyalgia symptoms was associated with a reduction of the connectivity between the central area and HR, between central and frontal areas, within the central area itself, and between central and occipital areas. The sham group and poor responders experienced no changes in their fibromyalgia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide new evidence that neurofeedback is a promising tool that can be used to treat of chronic pain syndromes and to obtain a better understanding of the interactions between physiological networks. These findings are preliminary, but they may pave the way for future studies that are more methodologically robust. In addition, new research questions are raised: what is the role of the central-peripheral network in chronic pain and what is the effect of neurofeedback on this network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alba et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Fibromyalgia (n=17). Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) neurofeedback training vs. Fake training (SHAM) was evaluated on Pain ratings and connectivity between EEG and heart rate. Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training reduced pain ratings and central-heart rate connectivity in good responders, whereas the sham group experienced no changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: