Key result
Newer P2Y12 antagonists were associated with lower ADP-induced platelet reactivity (139 vs 313 AU*min, p=0.006) and higher plasma miR-223 levels compared to clopidogrel.
Why the study?
Do newer P2Y12 antagonists compared to clopidogrel alter plasma miR-223 levels and platelet reactivity in men with NSTE-ACS?
Observational (n=21)
No
Do newer P2Y12 antagonists compared to clopidogrel alter plasma miR-223 levels and platelet reactivity in men with NSTE-ACS?
Absolute Event Rate: 139% vs 313%
p-value: p=0.006
More potent platelet inhibition with newer P2Y12 antagonists is associated with higher, rather than lower, plasma miR-223 levels, challenging its utility as a marker of low platelet responsiveness.
Challenges miR-223 as low-responsiveness marker despite potent inhibition in NSTE-ACS; leaves open prospective validation.
Decreased plasma levels of microRNA-223 (miR-223), predominantly of platelet origin, were proposed as a surrogate marker of efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. However, higher on-treatment platelet reactivity was associated with lower plasma miR-223 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including clopidogrel and aspirin. Our aim was to compare plasma miR-223 and platelet reactivity in CAD patients on DAPT with newer P2Y12 antagonists vs. clopidogrel. We studied 21 men with CAD admitted to our centre owing to a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, and with an uncomplicated hospital course. From the day of admission, the patients were receiving either clopidogrel (n = 11) or prasugrel/ticagrelor (n = 10) in addition to aspirin. Before discharge, miR-223 expression in plasma was estimated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using the comparative Ct method relative to miR-16 as an endogenous control. Multiple electrode aggregometry was used to assess platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). ADP-induced platelet reactivity was decreased in the patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with those on clopidogrel (mean ± SD: 139 ± 71 vs. 313 ± 162 arbitrary units [AU]*min, p = 0.006), due to a more potent antiplatelet activity of the novel P2Y12 antagonists. Consequently, six out of seven patients in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation were treated with the newer P2Y12 blockers, whereas six out of seven patients in the upper tertile were on clopidogrel. Plasma miR-223 was elevated with decreasing platelet reactivity (Spearman's rho = -0.52; p = 0.015 for trend), being significantly higher in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (median [range]: 1.06 [0.25-2.31]) vs. the upper tertile (0.20 [0.13-2.30]) (p = 0.04). In conclusion, our preliminary results argue against the notion of low plasma miR-223 as a marker of platelet responsiveness to DAPT. On the contrary, more potent platelet inhibition associated mainly with newer P2Y12 antagonists appears to coincide with higher miR-223 relative to the subjects with attenuated responsiveness to DAPT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chyrchel et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=21). Newer P2Y12 antagonists (prasugrel or ticagrelor) vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on ADP-induced platelet reactivity (AU*min) (p=0.006). Newer P2Y12 antagonists were associated with lower ADP-induced platelet reactivity (139 vs 313 AU*min, p=0.006) and higher plasma miR-223 levels compared to clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: