Key result
Switching to ticagrelor after first AMI lowers 72-hour miR-125b expression vs clopidogrel.
Why the study?
The mechanism by which ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular mortality after AMI compared to clopidogrel is unknown, particularly regarding proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs.
Does switching to ticagrelor reduce the expression of proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs compared to continuing clopidogrel in patients after first AMI?
RCT (n=60)
Does switching to ticagrelor reduce the expression of proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs compared to continuing clopidogrel in patients after first AMI?
Ticagrelor transiently downregulates the expression of proatherogenic miR-125b compared to clopidogrel in patients after AMI, providing a potential mechanism for its superior clinical benefits.
Ticagrelor may downregulate proatherogenic miR-125b post-AMI; extends RCT evidence on P2Y12 pleiotropy but leaves clinical translation open.
BACKGROUND: Platelet P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to clopidogrel, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Because activated platelets release proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs, including miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223, we hypothesized that the expression of these miRNAs is lower on ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel. OBJECTIVES: We compared miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223 expression in plasma of patients after AMI treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. METHODS: After percutaneous coronary intervention on acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel, 60 patients with first AMI were randomized to switch to ticagrelor or to continue with clopidogrel. Plasma expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction at baseline and after 72 h and 6 months of treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients and one in 30 healthy volunteers. Multiple electrode aggregometry using ADP test was used to determine platelet reactivity in response to P2Y12 inhibitors. RESULTS: Expression of miR-125b was higher in patients with AMI 72 h and 6 months, compared to healthy volunteers (p = 0.001), whereas expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 were comparable. In patients randomized to ticagrelor, expression of miR-125b decreased at 72 h (p = 0.007) and increased back to baseline at 6 months (p = 0.005). Expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 was not affected by the switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor treatment leads to lower plasma expression of miR-125b after AMI, compared to clopidogrel. Higher expression of miR-125b might explain recurrent thrombotic events and worse clinical outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel, compared to ticagrelor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gąsecka et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=60). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Plasma expression of miR-125b (p=0.007). Switching to ticagrelor after first AMI decreased plasma expression of miR-125b at 72 hours compared to clopidogrel (p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: