Key result
Low area-level socioeconomic status was associated with a 34% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with high area-level socioeconomic status (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.27-1.42).
Why the study?
The associations of area-level socioeconomic status and individual-level factors with mortality have not been well investigated, especially in China during rapid industrial development.
Does low area-level socioeconomic status increase the risk of mortality in adults aged over 40?
Cohort (n=174,004)
Yes
Does low area-level socioeconomic status increase the risk of mortality in adults aged over 40?
Hazard Ratio: 1.34 (95% CI 1.27–1.42)
Low area-level socioeconomic status is significantly associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in China, with individual lifestyle and metabolic factors partially mediating this risk.
Area-level SES links to higher mortality warrant monitoring; leaves open whether interventions targeting deprivation reduce gaps in China.
BACKGROUND: Although socioeconomic inequality in mortality has long been a public health focus, the associations of area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and individual-level factors with mortality have not been well investigated, especially in China with rapid industrial development. METHODS: In this nationwide, population-based, prospective cohort study, adults aged over 40 from 29 counties were included in the China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort study. The composite area deprivation index of area-level SES was generated from national census data and categorised into tertiles. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to calculate HRs and 95% CIs for area-level SES with the risk of mortality, and comprehensive individual socioeconomic, lifestyle, and metabolic factors were examined as potential mediators. RESULTS: A total of 174 004 participants were included. During a median follow-up of 10.1 years, low area-level SES was associated with 34% increased risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.27 to 1.42), 76% increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (95% CI 1.59 to 1.94) and 13% increased risk of non-CVD mortality (95% CI 1.05 to 1.21) compared with high area-level SES. The association between area-level SES and all-cause mortality was partly mediated by individual socioeconomic, lifestyle and metabolic factors, contributing 3.8%, 20.7% and 8.9%, respectively. Furthermore, individuals with low area-level SES and low individual SES, unhealthy lifestyles, or poor metabolic status had the highest risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Significant area-level socioeconomic inequalities in mortality exist in China. Comprehensive interventions targeting both area-level circumstances and individual socioeconomic, lifestyle and metabolic factors were key strategies to reduce these inequalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2025) reported a cohort. Low area-level socioeconomic status vs. High area-level socioeconomic status was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.27-1.42). Low area-level socioeconomic status was associated with a 34% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with high area-level socioeconomic status (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.27-1.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: