Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and anterior chamber width (ACW) measurements using 3-dimensional (3-D) corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CAS-OCT) and 2-dimensional (2-D) anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. DESIGN: Nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: The CCT, ACD, and ACW were measured in normal eyes using a prototype 3-D swept-source CAS-OCT device and a 2-D time-domain AS-OCT device (Visante). The coefficient of repeatability and reproducibility and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements. RESULTS: Eighty-five eyes (85 subjects) were evaluated. The mean CCT measurement was 557.5 μm ± 40.5 (SD) with CAS-OCT and 556.4 ± 39.4 μm with AS-OCT; the mean ACD measurement, 3.13 ± 0.40 mm and 3.16 ± 0.39 mm, respectively; and the mean ACW, 11.80 ± 0.47 mm and 11.79 ± 0.49 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CCT or ACW measurements between the 2 devices (P>.05, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Although the ACD measurements were significantly different (P<.0001), the difference was small (0.03 mm). Significant linear correlations were found between the measurements of the 2 devices (P<.0001). The ICC was greater than 0.99 for CAS-OCT and greater than 0.96 for AS-OCT. CONCLUSION: Corneal and anterior segment OCT and AS-OCT provided comparable and well-correlated anterior ocular biometric measurements, with sufficient repeatability and reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuda et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: