Key result
Histological features of malignancy in ependymomas showed no correlation with postoperative survival or likelihood of clinical recurrence.
Observational (n=15)
Yes
Histological features of malignant ependymomas do not correlate with clinical recurrence or postoperative survival, contrasting with the known correlations in astrocytomas.
Questions prognostic value of histology in ependymomas unlike astrocytomas; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
It is widely believed that an important determinant of clinical behavior and prognosis in patients harboring an ependymoma is the histological grade of malignancy of the tumor. Excluding from the present analysis examples of ependymoblastoma (a highly cellular, embryonal tumor occurring in children, with a notably poor prognosis and a tendency to subarachnoid spread), an attempt was made to correlate 15 cases of histologically malignant ependymoma with clinical recurrence and postoperative patient survival times. Ten patients (67%) were alive from 15 months to 14 years after surgery (median survival time 8.8 years); one patient had a histologically benign recurrence 11 years after surgical resection. Five patients (33%) died from a local recurrence of their tumor; their postoperative survival times ranged from 13 months to 6 years (median 2.5 years). The prognosis of malignant ependymomas is therefore highly variable. No correlation was possible between the tumor's histological features, site, or likelihood of recurrence. This lack of clinicohistopathological concordance contrasts with the known correlations that exist in astrocytomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Malignant ependymoma (n=15). Histological features of malignancy was evaluated on Postoperative survival and clinical recurrence. Histological features of malignancy in ependymomas showed no correlation with postoperative survival or likelihood of clinical recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: