Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the micro-costing of viscosupplementation procedures compared to different infiltration regimens. Methods: This study compared, through the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing method, the micro-costing of these different application regimens using national cost averages as a basis for calculation in a medium-sized outpatient service. Results: The results demonstrated that the difference in costs with the single application is 31.47% less for three and 119.13% for five applications. Conclusions: No study showed a superiority of the five-application regimen over the three-application regimen, which leads one to believe that there is no justification for this procedure from an economic or quality-of-life point of view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: