Why the study?
Does automatic 3D bi-ventricle shape analysis from CMR images correlate with clinical diagnostic parameters and arrhythmias in patients with ARVC?
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
No
Does automatic 3D bi-ventricle shape analysis from CMR images correlate with clinical diagnostic parameters and arrhythmias in patients with ARVC?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automatic 3D ventricular shape analysis from CMR images provides high sensitivity for classifying ARVC and correlates with clinical risk markers including history of arrhythmias.
BACKGROUND: Altered right ventricular structure is an important feature of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC), but is challenging to quantify objectively. The aim of this study was to go beyond ventricular volumes and diameters and to explore if the shape of the right and left ventricles could be assessed and related to clinical measures. We used quantifiable computational methods to automatically identify and analyse malformations in ARVC patients from Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) images. Furthermore, we investigated how automatically extracted structural features were related to arrhythmic events. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional feasibility study was performed on CMR short axis cine images of 27 ARVC patients and 21 ageing asymptomatic control subjects. All images were segmented at the end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) phases of the cardiac cycle to create three-dimensional (3D) bi-ventricle shape models for each subject. The most common components to single- and bi-ventricular shape in the ARVC population were identified and compared to those obtained from the control group. The correlations were calculated between identified ARVC shapes and parameters from the 2010 Task Force Criteria, in addition to clinical outcomes such as ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: Bi-ventricle shape for the ARVC population showed, as ordered by prevalence with the percent of total variance in the population explained by each shape: global dilation/shrinking of both ventricles (44 %), elongation/shortening at the right ventricle (RV) outflow tract (15 %), tilting at the septum (10 %), shortening/lengthening of both ventricles (7 %), and bulging/shortening at both the RV inflow and outflow (5 %). Bi-ventricle shapes were significantly correlated to several clinical diagnostic parameters and outcomes, including (but not limited to) correlations between global dilation and electrocardiography (ECG) major criteria (p = 0.002), and base-to-apex lengthening and history of arrhythmias (p = 0.003). Classification of ARVC vs. control using shape modes yielded high sensitivity (96 %) and moderate specificity (81 %). CONCLUSION: We presented for the first time an automatic method for quantifying and analysing ventricular shapes in ARVC patients from CMR images. Specific ventricular shape features were highly correlated with diagnostic indices in ARVC patients and yielded high classification sensitivity. Ventricular shape analysis may be a novel approach to classify ARVC disease, and may be used in diagnosis and in risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McLeod et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (n=48). 3D bi-ventricular shape features from cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs. Asymptomatic controls was evaluated on Classification of ARVC vs. control using summed regional bi-ventricle shape modes (90% overall predictive accuracy).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: