Key result
iT2prep-BOOST MRI shows ~50% higher plaque signal ratio in culprit vs non-culprit segments.
Why the study?
Does iT2prep-BOOST accurately identify culprit and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected NSTEMI?
Observational (n=41)
No
Does iT2prep-BOOST accurately identify culprit and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected NSTEMI?
The novel non-contrast CMR sequence iT2prep-BOOST can simultaneously visualize coronary artery lumen and plaque, successfully differentiating normal from non-culprit and culprit segments.
Detection of vulnerable coronary plaque can predict future myocardial infarctions. We have developed a novel, non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequence (iT2prep-BOOST), enabling simultaneous, co-registered coronary angiography and plaque detection. To validate iT2prep-BOOST in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). 41 patients with suspected NSTEMI were recruited. Invasive coronary angiography ± intravascular imaging was used to classify coronary segments into the following categories: normal, non-culprit and culprit segments; stenosed segments as well as segments with vulnerable plaque features (lipid, calcium, fibroatheroma, thin cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), plaque-rupture and thrombus). The plaque/myocardial signal intensity ratio (PMR) in each coronary segment was analyzed on iT2prep-BOOST. The mean ± standard deviation PMR of culprit segments was significantly higher than non-culprit segments and normal segments (1.01 ± 0.14 vs. 0.67 ± 0.18 vs. 0.35 ± 0.24, P<0.001, respectively). Coronary segments with lipid, calcium, and fibroatheroma had a significantly higher PMR compared to normal coronary segments (P<0.001), but significantly lower than segments with plaque-rupture and intraluminal thrombus (P<0.05). There was a progressive increase in PMR with increasing coronary segment stenosis (P<0.001). There was a significant association on multivariable analysis between HbA1c as well as family history of coronary artery disease and mean PMR (P = 0.05 and P = 0.04, respectively). iT2prep-BOOST has the potential to simultaneously visualize coronary artery lumen and plaque and differentiate normal segments from non-culprit and culprit plaque segments non-invasively and without contrast. The prognostic value of PMR needs to be investigated in a prospective multicenter study. 1. A patient who presented with chest pain, peak high sensitivity troponin of 13459 ng/L and ST-segment depression in the inferior electrocardiogram leads. A -Bright-blood coronary angiography from iT2Prep-BOOST showing a stenosis in the proximal RCA (white arrow). B -Co-registered fusion image of iT2Prep-BOOST bright-blood and black-blood datasets showing increased signal from the proximal RCA lesion (white arrow). C -Invasive coronary angiography showing a subtle stenosis in the proximal RCA (white arrow). D -Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement short axis image showing a partial thickness infarction affecting the basal inferior wall (white arrows). E -Pre-contrast T2 mapping showing increased signal in the basal inferior wall (white arrows). F -Optical coherence tomography of the proximal RCA lesion demonstrating acute plaque rupture and intraluminal thrombus (yellow arrows). 2. Dot strip plot showing the per-segment analysis of the mean ± standard deviation PMR of normal segments, bystander non-culprit segments and culprit segments as identified iT2Prep-BOOST. PMR plaque to myocardial signal intensity ratio, RCA right coronary artery, SD standard deviation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajhosseiny et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected NSTEMI (n=41). iT2prep-BOOST cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequence vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Plaque/myocardial signal intensity ratio (PMR) in culprit vs non-culprit segments (p=<0.001). The iT2prep-BOOST MRI sequence yielded a significantly higher plaque/myocardial signal intensity ratio in culprit segments compared to non-culprit and normal segments (1.01 vs 0.67 vs 0.35; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: