Key result
NIRS-IVUS lipid burden and atheroma volume predict PCI-related myocardial injury, whereas CCTA density does not.
Why the study?
The study compared the efficacy of CCTA and NIRS-IVUS in patients with significant coronary stenosis for predicting periprocedural myocardial injury during PCI.
Does NIRS-IVUS or CCTA better predict periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=107)
Single-blind
No
Does NIRS-IVUS or CCTA better predict periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 27.1% vs 10.2%
p-value: p=0.023
NIRS-IVUS metrics may aid periprocedural risk stratification in PCI; leaves open CCTA role and requires prospective validation.
Background This study compares the efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS–IVUS) in patients with significant coronary stenosis for predicting periprocedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We prospectively enrolled 107 patients who underwent CCTA before PCI and performed NIRS–IVUS during PCI. Based on the maximal lipid core burden index for any 4-mm longitudinal segments (maxLCBI4mm) in the culprit lesion, we divided the patients into two groups: lipid-rich plaque (LRP) group (maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400; n = 48) and no-LRP group (maxLCBI4mm < 400; n = 59). Periprocedural myocardial injury was a postprocedural cardiac troponin T (cTnT) elevation of ≥5 times the upper limit of normal. Results The LRP group had a significantly higher cTnT ( p = 0.026), lower CT density ( p < 0.001), larger percentage atheroma volume (PAV) by NIRS–IVUS ( p = 0.036), and larger remodeling index measured by both CCTA ( p = 0.020) and NIRS–IVUS ( p < 0.001). A significant negative linear correlation was found between maxLCBI4mm and CT density (rho = −0.552, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified maxLCBI4mm [odds ratio (OR): 1.006, p = 0.003] and PAV (OR: 1.125, p = 0.014) as independent predictors of periprocedural myocardial injury, while CT density was not an independent predictor (OR: 0.991, p = 0.22). Conclusion CCTA and NIRS–IVUS correlated well to identify LRP in culprit lesions. However, NIRS–IVUS was more competent in predicting the risk of periprocedural myocardial injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ota et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=107). Lipid-rich plaque (maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400) vs. No lipid-rich plaque (maxLCBI4mm < 400) was evaluated on Periprocedural myocardial injury (postprocedural cTnT elevation ≥5 times ULN) (p=0.023). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, NIRS-IVUS-derived maximal lipid core burden index and percent atheroma volume were independent predictors of periprocedural myocardial injury, whereas CCTA-derived CT density was not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: