Key result
A 70-year-old man with a permanent pacemaker developed shock due to cardiac tamponade caused by aortic perforation from a right atrial pacing lead following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Aortic perforation caused by a pacing lead is a rare complication of permanent pacemaker implantation that has been described only in case reports.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the rare risk of aortic perforation by a pacing lead exacerbated by extra-support guides during PCI.
Alerts clinicians to aortic perforation risk post-PPM; extends sparse case reports on this rare event.
Background: Lead perforation is an uncommon complication of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, occurring in 0.1-0.8% of cases (1). Aortic perforation caused by a pacing lead is rare and has been described only in case reports. Case summary: A 70-year-old Chinese man with a medical history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented to the hospital with intermittent chest pain of 3 weeks duration. He was diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to left anterior descending artery. Two days after post-PCI, he developed shock due to cardiac tamponade. A repeat angiogram was unremarkable; however, during thoracotomy, the right atrial pacing lead of a dual-chamber pacemaker, implanted 6 weeks previously for complete heart block, was found to have perforated the aorta. The patient was discharged in stable condition 20 days after successful repair of the aortic perforation. Discussion: Careful analysis of non-specific chest pain is crucial. This case highlights the importance of considering rare sequelae after multiple cardiac procedures, such as PPM and PCI. This case demonstrates the risk of aortic injury from extra-support guides during PCI, particularly near right atrial pacing leads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Aortic perforation and cardiac tamponade (n=1). Percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated. A 70-year-old man with a permanent pacemaker developed shock due to cardiac tamponade caused by aortic perforation from a right atrial pacing lead following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: