Key result
Laser-assisted lead extraction using the laser sheath as a guide rail achieved successful new lead implantation in 92.4% of patients with supra-cardiac occlusion of central veins, with no procedural deaths.
Why the study?
Bilateral subclavian, innominate, or superior vena cava obstruction presents a major limitation to CIED revision or upgrade.
Does laser-assisted lead extraction using a laser sheath as a guide rail allow for successful and safe lead revision or upgrade in patients with supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins?
Observational (n=106)
No
Does laser-assisted lead extraction using a laser sheath as a guide rail allow for successful and safe lead revision or upgrade in patients with supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins?
Laser-assisted lead extraction using the laser sheath as a guide rail is a highly successful and safe technique for CIED lead revision or upgrade in patients with supra-cardiac central vein occlusion.
Laser sheath-guided revision in venous occlusion shows low complications; leaves open need for prospective trials before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: The implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has increased in the last decades with improvement in the quality of life of patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. The presence of bilateral subclavian, innominate or superior vena cava obstruction is a major limitation to device revision and/or upgrade. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This is retrospective study of patients who underwent laser-assisted lead extraction (LLE) (GlideLight laser sheath, Spectranetics Corporation, Colorado Springs, USA) with lead revision or upgrade using the laser sheath as a guide rail. Patients with known occlusion, severe stenosis or functional obstruction of the venous access vessels with indwelling leads were included in this study. RESULTS: 106 patients underwent percutaneous LLE with lead revision and/or upgrade. Preoperative known complete occlusion or severe stenosis of access veins was present in 23 patients (21.5%). More patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) underwent LLE (64.1%) than patients with CRT-Ds (24.5%) and pacemaker patients (11.3%). In total 172 leads were extracted: 79 (45.9%) single-coil defibrillator leads, 35 (20.3%) dual-coil defibrillator leads, 31 (18.0%) right atrial leads, 24 (13.9%) right ventricular leads and three (1.7%) malfunctional coronary sinus left ventricular pacing leads. The mean age of leads was 99.2±65.6 months. The implantation of new leads after crossing the venous stenosis/obstruction was successful in 98 (92.4%) cases. Postoperative complications were pocket hematoma in two cases and wound infection in one case. No peri-operative and no immediate postoperative death was recorded. One intraoperative superior vena cava tear was treated by immediate thoracotomy and surgical repair. CONCLUSION: In a single-center study on LLE in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for CIED lead upgrade and revision we could demonstrate a low procedural complication rate with no procedural deaths. Most of the leads could be completely extracted to revise or upgrade the system. Our study showed a low complication rate, with acceptable mortality rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Maisary et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Supra-cardiac occlusion or severe stenosis of central veins with indwelling leads requiring CIED upgrade or revision (n=106). Laser-assisted lead extraction (LLE) was evaluated on Successful new lead implantation after crossing the venous stenosis/obstruction. Laser-assisted lead extraction using the laser sheath as a guide rail achieved successful new lead implantation in 92.4% of patients with supra-cardiac occlusion of central veins, with no procedural deaths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: