Key result
Myocardial infarction was not significantly associated with an increased overall risk of incident cancer compared with controls (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.19; P=0.153).
Why the study?
Accumulating evidence showed positive relations between myocardial infarction and new-onset cancer, motivating an investigation into whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer.
Does myocardial infarction increase the risk of incident cancer compared to controls?
Meta-Analysis
Does myocardial infarction increase the risk of incident cancer compared to controls?
Myocardial infarction is not associated with a significantly increased overall risk of incident cancer, though there may be a short-term increased risk, particularly in females and for lung cancer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MI may raise post-MI cancer risk; hypothesis-generating for screening and causality trials.
Objective: Accumulating evidences showed some positive relations between myocardial infarction (MI) and new onset cancer. We aim to investigate whether MI is associated with an increased risk of incident cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature list was identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception until October 2018. The main inclusion criteria included observational studies investigating the association between MI and new onset cancer. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: Of 862 potentially relevant studies, five cohort studies met all inclusion criteria. The pooled cancer incidence rate was 9.5% (95% CI=8.3–10.7%). Pooled analysis of OR showed that the increased overall cancer risk in MI patients in comparison with controls had no statistical significance (OR=1.08; 95% CI=0.97–1.19, P =0.153). Subgroup analysis by gender demonstrated that the overall cancer risk was only significantly increased in female (OR=1.10; 95% CI=1.01–1.20, P =0.025), but not in male patients (OR=1.04; 95% CI=0.99–1.10, P =0.124). In terms of cancer type, the increased cancer risk was only significant for lung cancer (male OR=1.12; 95% CI=1.05–1.19, P <0.01; and female OR=1.51; 95% CI=1.15–1.99, P <0.01), but not for prostate (OR=0.96; 95% CI=0.85–1.09, P =0.546) or breast cancer (OR=0.94; 95% CI=0.86–1.04, P =0.222). In addition, the increased cancer risk was only significant in the first 6 months (OR=1.93; 95% CI=1.42–2.63, P <0.01) but not in 6 months–1-year (OR=1.03; 95% CI=0.92–1.15, P =0.627) or >1-year (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.93–1.04, P =0.585) follow-up after MI. Conclusion: From available evidence, the increased overall cancer risk after MI was only significant in female but not in male patients. Besides, the increased cancer risk could be driven by increased short-term cancer incidence after MI and certain cancer types such as lung cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction vs. Controls was evaluated on New onset cancer (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97-1.19, p=0.153). Myocardial infarction was not significantly associated with an increased overall risk of incident cancer compared with controls (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.19; P=0.153).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: