Key result
Electromagnetic interference caused inappropriate ICD shocks in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy despite active 'Noise reversion' and 'SecureSense' algorithms.
Why the study?
ICD shocks are a source of anxiety and concern, prompting an investigation into inappropriate shocks from EMI despite active Noise reversion and SecureSense algorithms.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights a case of inappropriate ICD shocks caused by electromagnetic interference despite the presence of noise reversion and SecureSense algorithms.
EMI may cause inappropriate ICD shocks despite noise reversion and SecureSense; leaves open need for improved real-world EMI detection.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks are always a matter of anxiety and concern for both patient and clinician. We report a case of ischemic cardiomyopathy who reported to us after receiving two shocks within 48 hours. The therapy was inappropriate as noted from device logs. EMI was identified as the incriminating cause. We discuss the reasons why he received the therapy despite active 'Noise reversion' and 'SecureSense' algorithms to avoid noise /EMI related oversensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukherjee et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Ischemic cardiomyopathy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (n=1). Electromagnetic interference (EMI) was evaluated on Inappropriate ICD shock. Electromagnetic interference caused inappropriate ICD shocks in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy despite active 'Noise reversion' and 'SecureSense' algorithms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: