Key result
Mechanical circulatory support during TAVR or mTEER is linked to >26-fold higher mortality.
Why the study?
Mechanical circulatory support is occasionally required with TAVR and mTEER, but outcomes data are lacking.
Observational (n=330,055)
Yes
Effect estimate: >26-fold increase
Absolute Event Rate: 26.82% vs 1.01%
p-value: p=<0.001
Retrospective cohort study reveals markedly elevated mortality with mechanical circulatory support during transcatheter valve therapies, indicating high baseline procedural risk.
Background The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER) is occasionally required; however, outcomes data are lacking.Methods We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to identify hospital admissions of adults treated with TAVR and mTEER, with or without MCS, between 2018 and 2021.Results We identified 330,055 patients undergoing TAVR and mTEER, with 3240 in the MCS group and 326,815 in the non-MCS group. From 2018 to 2021, there was a steady increase in procedural volume (P for trend <0.001). Utilization of MCS remained stable (P for trend: total 0.096). The use of any MCS modality was associated with a >26-fold increase in mortality (1.01% vs 26.82%, P < 0.001). Mortality remained steadily high with MCS use (P for trend = 0.08). Length of stay and cost of hospitalization were higher in the MCS group (P < 0.05 for both).Conclusion The use of MCS in patients undergoing TAVR or mTEER was associated with higher mortality, morbidity, and healthcare utilization; however, causation cannot be determined given the inherent limitations of the dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghoneem et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing TAVR and mTEER (n=330,055). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) vs. No mechanical circulatory support was evaluated on Mortality (>26-fold increase, p=<0.001). Mechanical circulatory support during TAVR or mTEER was associated with a >26-fold increase in mortality compared to no support (26.82% vs 1.01%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: