Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model calculations on Al₁₀{NH}₃$ clusters are used to study the chemisorptive interaction of ${NH}₃$ with the Al(111) surface. It is assumed that the ammonia molecule stabilizes on the surface with the N center pointing towards the metal and two different surface sites, on top and threefold hollow, are examined. The energetics of the NH₃-Al interaction are described in detail. The interaction between the frozen charge distributions of the NH₃ and Al₁₀ subunits is repulsive for both sites. However, the repulsion is much larger in the threefold hollow site than in the on-top site. The charge rearrangements that are important for the bonding are the intra-unit polarizations of both NH₃ and Al₁₀ in the presence of the other (frozen) subunit. These polarizations make attractive electrostatic contributions. They are larger for the on-top site. As a consequence, the NH₃-Al interaction leads to a 0.8 eV binding in the on-top site whereas the threefold hollow site is repulsive. In both sites, NH₃ to metal a₁ donation is of minor importance. This is in contrast to the bonding scheme suggested from photoemission on NH₃/metal systems. A large differential shift of the 3a₁ ionization potential (IP) for adsorbed NH₃ has been interpreted as major involvement of the NH₃ 3a₁ orbital in the NH₃--metal bond. We show that the differential 3a₁ IP shift is not related to its involvement in the bonding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hermann et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: