Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To characterize the efficacy of the dual FXR/TGR5 receptor agonist INT-767 upon histological endpoints in a rodent model of diet-induced and biopsy-confirmed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). METHODS: NASH study compared INT-767 (3 and 10 mg/kg) to obeticholic acid (OCA) (10 or 30 mg/kg; 16 wk). Primary histological endpoints included qualitative and quantitative assessments of NASH. Other metabolic and plasma endpoints were also assessed. A comparative assessment of INT-767 and OCA effects on drug distribution and hepatic gene expression was performed in C57Bl/6 mice on standard chow. C57Bl/6 mice were orally dosed with INT-767 or OCA (1-30 mg/kg) for 2 wk, and expression levels of candidate genes were assessed by RNA sequencing and tissue drug levels were measured by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: INT-767 dose-dependently (3 and 10 mg/kg, PO, QD, 8 wk) improved qualitative morphometric scores on steatohepatitis severity, inflammatory infiltrates and fibrosis stage. Quantitative morphometric analyses revealed that INT-767 reduced parenchymal collagen area, collagen fiber density, inflammation (assessed by Galectin-3 immunohistochemistry) and hepatocyte lipid droplet area following INT-767 treatment. In a comparative study (16 wk), the FXR agonists OCA (10 and 30 mg/kg) and INT-767 (3 and 10 mg/kg) both improved NASH histopathology, with INT-767 exerting greater therapeutic potency and efficacy than OCA. Mechanistic studies suggest that both drugs accumulate similarly within the liver and ileum, however, the effects of INT-767 may be driven by enhanced hepatic, but not ileal, FXR function. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm the potential utility of FXR and dual FXR/TGR5 activation as disease intervention strategies in NASH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roth et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: